Member Login

F.A.Q

  • 1. Why should I choose ff14-gil.org?

    We have rich experience in online game support, you can enjoy the best service if you buy FFXIV gil in our safe store, and we also ensure you a delivery within 10 minutes and a lowest price for gil...

  • 2. What kind of FFXIV services do you offer for us?

    We offer you the gil and the power level for the game. Besides, we offer you the FFXIV guide and related news for you in our news part. And when you have any problems to the game and to us, you can...

  • 3. What benefits can I enjoy as a registered member here?

    As a registered member, you will enjoy better discount for cheap archeage gil in our store, and you will be kept updated when we have further member activities for you. Also, you personal information will be covered for...

You Got Theme Park in My Sandbox

Market Segment or Market Direction?

There isn't much to say right now about Final Fantasy XIV: A Realm Reborn.  We are still waiting for Beta-4 and the the eventual re-launch.  It's as good a time as any to think about the larger MMO market and how FFXIV:ARR fits into that market.

One thing that fascinates me in MMO development is the rush of "me too" design philosophies.  Make no mistake, these always involve genuine and important design decisions. cheap ffxi gil. They become “me too” when the industry kind of latches on to an idea and every MMO in development starts including them as marketing buzzwords.

In recent years, the "me too" design of the month has included the 'no Holy Trinity approach,' 'action combat,' and 'story based gameplay.'  Each of these are important decisions and I'm not knocking these choices, they represent attempts to define new market segments.

However, when everyone starts building in their "me too" answer, it stops being a market segment and just becomes the general market again.  It’s not a differentiator if everyone else does it too.  Worse, when an MMO is primarily built around a "me too" (non) differentiator without much more than a shell of an additional game, it hurts the genre.  More than once, players have found all the hype and excitement of "something different" turns out to be less than thrilling in application.

The design candidate that seem next up on the horizon for "me too" status is 'sandbox design.' In the last few weeks we have heard that MMO players are tired of theme parks to much agreement from the community.  We have seen a storied MMO franchise promise that their next iteration will be the most sandboxy sandbox to ever sand, or box for that matter.  That announcement alone helped launch that game to the most anticipated MMO here at MMORPG with nary an additional detail offered!

While the EQ-Next reveal opens the door for a separate discussion about what aspects of an MMO are core experiences, they definitely are trying to move in a sandbox direction.  Everyone and their dog seems to be rushing to Iceland to join CCP in sandbox MMO's.

A Rose by any other name

The interesting thing is that I'm not sure we are all talking about the same thing.

I suspect we generally mean similar things when we say sandbox or theme park for that matter.  However, occasionally I am reminded that this isn't entirely true.  I have recently seen people opine that the original EverQuest was a sandbox game and frankly that boggles my mind.  In its heyday, EQ was THE theme park to pure sandboxes like Ultima Online or Star Wars Galaxies.

However, if I'm talking to someone whose MMO experience is EQ and a recent MMO, I guess I can see how that disconnect happens.  EQ was a theme park, but the rides weren’t quite as obvious and they weren't staged with neon lights screaming "hey, a ride is over here, grab your tickets and fasten your seat belts!"  While the dragons did spawn on timers, we didn't have our own apps to let us know when to mount up.

I suppose the best way to start thinking about this is to use Lego's.  The Lego corporation has sandboxes and theme parks.  A big 1000-count Lego box of assorted pieces?  That's a sandbox.  The Lego city set that builds a store-front, superhero, race car, or Lord of the Rings set piece?  That's a theme park.

Lego has reinvigorated their bottom line over the years by moving away from being a sandbox company and becoming a blended sandbox and theme park company.  Why?  For every customer who looks at a 1000 Lego's and sees infinite opportunities there are a dozen who see a disorganized mess.  Why not sell 13 different sets and make each of them happy?  It's also a bit easier to enforce trademark on theme parks than it is on boxes of blocks, but that's just stuff that keeps the lawyers paid.

For this article I'm working with the following definition.  A sandbox game is one where the player has significant and meaningful range of control over the development of their character and the world around their character.  A theme park game is one where the character plays more "on rails" and follows a heavily predetermined path for their character in and amidst a generally static, unchanging world.

So, let's look at EverQuest.  Your character development was pretty static, your class determined nearly everything.  There were a handful of spells which required some effort to obtain and your choices, or lack of choices, in using different weapons could narrow the range of your characters options.  But even then, a Warrior wasn't ever going to heal and a Paladin wasn't going to nuke.  From a character perspective, virtually every meaningful choice was made at character creation.

The world offered more of the same.  The same gnoll is probably still running around Qeynos Hills shouting the same lines he did a dozen years ago as is the dark elf in the commonlands.  The rides are all the same as they once were, be they dungeons, planes, or favorite grinding spots.

However, players had a few ways of customizing their experience in the world, ways that are not present in modern games.

First, you had factions.  Not just treadmills to grind up for new loot or red-team/blue-team PVP factions, but dynamic factions in which advancing one cost you against another.  You could, with enough effort, become loved or hated anywhere in the world.  This effectively changed which creatures were hostile and which were allies.  With enough time and muffins, even an Iksar could be loved in Rivervale!

Second, the lack of instancing meant that PVE itself was a competitive (or co-operitition) based environment.  You could block people from content by killing it (or kill stealing it), you could train people, and there were some even less scrupulous things you could do!  I am not calling for a return of fully competitive PVE.  I am not longing for camp checks and I don't really want to see a return of kill stealing, please don't go there in the comments!

My point is that these systems, as screwed up as they were, resulted in players having some small degree of ability to influence the world around them.  Granted, the way players chose to use those tools is the reason theme parks have become even more theme park-like.  Spoiler alert: people on the Internet do not always play nice with each other.